Lively forum airs NDAA issues

Audience gathers before forum. About 35 people attended Thursday evening's event

Audience gathers before forum. About 35 people attended Thursday evening’s event. (Click for photo slideshow)

Impassioned, knowledgeable speakers and a lively, engaged audience — including two Takoma Park city council members, Seth Grimes and Kay Daniels-Cohen — made for a very successful NDAA forum last night at the Takoma Park Community Center.

Thomas Nephew welcomed about 35 forum-goers, speaking of the NDAA as a “civil liberties emergency.”  He said that both the forum itself and the NDAA/AUMF resolution that MCCRC is advocating are products of coalition and collaboration: “we built it from two model ordinances developed by the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and the ACLU, and worked with those organizations and the Defending Dissent Foundation to perfect it.  The result is a resolution that has been vetted by some of the best legal minds and civil liberties advocates in the country, and that is explicitly endorsed by the Maryland ACLU, the BORDC, Defending Dissent, and SAALT.”

Eric Bond, editor of the Takoma Park/Silver Spring Voice, introduced the two speakers of the evening: Heather Hurlburt, executive director of the National Security Network, and Shahid Buttar, executive director of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee.

The movement to oppose the NDAA is proving to be a remarkable cross-section of American politics and diversity, and last night’s audience was no exception.  Two members of the Japanese-American Citizens League reminded the audience that Japanese-Americans were once indefinitely detained without due process; Ron Paul supporters emphasized that they were Constitutional conservatives; Muslim-Americans asked probing questions and noted that they were bearing the brunt of the civil liberties losses of the past decade; Occupy supporters wondered about the connection between NDAA and the Occupy movement — and pointed to the Occupy movement as an example of people taking politics into their own hands.

The forum was a great success in the collaboration that went into publicizing it, in the size and diversity of the audience, and in the quality of the discussion by the speakers, moderator, and the audience; more in future posts.  At least one councilmember, Kay Daniels-Cohen, was enthusiastic about the audience’s engagement with the issue and the possibilities for community action.  Video of the event will be posted soon.

UPDATE:

Forum posts:

Forum videos:

  • Forum video playlist (select any below or play in succession)
  • (video) (03:23) Thomas Nephew introduction
  • (video) (02:59) Eric Bond, moderator
  • (video) (16:22) Remarks by Heather Hurlburt
  • (video) (07:59) Remarks by Shahid Buttar
  • (video) (15:30) Q&A by Eric Bond (video)
  • (video) (06:55) Q&A/remarks by Councilmembers Grimes, Daniels-Cohen
  • (video) (17:07) Q&A by audience: I
  • (video) (15:55) Q&A by audience: II
  • (video) (11:36) Q&A by audience: III
This entry was posted in Event, Post, Video and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Lively forum airs NDAA issues

  1. sueudry says:

    Can’t wait to see the video. Sorry I had to miss this event!

    Like

  2. Pingback: People's Blog for the Constitution » Congress cans the Constitution, as Chicago police abduct activists

  3. Pingback: NATO Summit: Congress cans the Constitution, as Chicago police abduct activists | Climate Connections

  4. Pingback: People's Blog for the Constitution » Hedges v. Obama: The Supreme Court digs its head deeper into the sand

  5. Pingback: <i>Hedges v. Obama</i>: The Supreme Court Digs Its Head Deeper Into the Sand | The News On Time

  6. Pingback: Hedges v. Obama: The Supreme Court Digs Its Head Deeper Into the Sand | Omaha Sun Times

  7. Pingback: Hedges v. Obama: The Supreme Court Digs Its Head Deeper Into the Sand | Political Ration

  8. Pingback: <i>Hedges v. Obama</i>: The Supreme Court Digs Its Head Deeper Into the Sand | Newsegator

  9. Pingback: Hedges v. Obama: Supreme Court Leaves NDAA Intact | PopularResistance.Org

  10. Pingback: Hedges v. Obama: The Supreme Court digs its head deeper into the sand | Tenth Amendment Center

  11. Pingback: Hedges v. Obama: The Supreme Court digs its head deeper into the sand | Nesara Network

  12. Pingback: Hedges v. Obama: The Supreme Court digs its head deeper into the sand | Michigan Standard

  13. Pingback: Supreme Court declined to banned indefinite detention | The Seeds of Destruction

Leave a comment