XOXOXO to secret admirer Government Security News!

We’re pleased to see that news of the ACLU-NCA/MCCRC “SAY NO! to Metro Bag Searches” petition and education drive  travels fast. Yesterday one online publication scooped the competition, writing

A Washington DC-area citizens’ civil rights group and the American Civil Liberties Union have launched a publicity and petition campaign against bag searches on the area’s subway system.

The Montgomery County Civil Rights Coalition (MCCRC) and the ACLU of the National Capital Area (ACLU-NCA) said their effort is “a public education and petition campaign against WMATA’s random bag search program.”

They even displayed the “Ride with Pride” image from one of the flyers!

GSNSo thanks, Government Security News — selected in 2007 as the “Official Publication” of the Homeland Security Industries Association” — for spreading the word! And as for this — aw, shucks, GSN, you’re makin’ us blush:

MCCRC has been a vocal opponent of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (WMATA) policy of random searches of passenger bags on its Metrorail system since they started last October.

Sure, they get some little things wrong — they’re not our flyers, our great allies at the ACLU-NCA developed and printed them; we’re not posting them, but handing them out; and petitioning will last well beyond this weekend.  But on the whole, this is the kind of journalism we think ought to regain GSN the coveted “Official Publication” of the Homeland Security Industries Association” award again in 2011!  After all, you have to tip your hat to a security industrial complex trade publication that takes the time to lay out the case against the bag searches:

Although the WMATA board has met repeatedly to discuss the policy, which groups say violates 4th Amendment Rights against illegal searches, it has not voted to repeal it.  […]

The [ACLU-NCA] flyers call the bag searches “security theater” and do very little to increase security. It contends random searches “move terrorists from one target to another perhaps simply by entering a Metro station through a different entrance.”

It adds that there are large costs associated with the program, including the cost to individual privacy.

“This project does not pass a balancing test because it is so full of loopholes and ways for a terrorist to avoid being searched that it simply makes no sense,” said the flyers.

We’ve been taking a step back and building a bit of a scrapbook of media mentions of the local fight against the WMATA bag search program.  We’re proud of all of them — but this one will always hold a special place in our hearts.  So here’s looking at you, GSN.

This entry was posted in Post and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to XOXOXO to secret admirer Government Security News!

  1. Lisa Simeone says:

    Thomas, as this person wrote on journalist Christopher Elliott’s travel blog:

    Jesse February 24, 2011 at 3:53 am

    and why haven’t we stood up for our quickly vanishing rights?
    Is it going to take someone burning themselves for this to happen?



  2. Lisa Simeone says:

    Thomas, fyi, apparently our security overlords don’t like criticism (surprise, surprise) or even skepticism — I posted a brief comment at the GSN article yesterday, but they never “approved” it. The article still lists zero comments:



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s